A Letter To The Editor that I submitted to the Richmond Times-Dispatch was published today! Frequent readers of this blog will likely not be surprised by the content:
Washington is caught up in Scandalmania 2013, and so, it seems, is
the letters section of this newspaper. Since news of the IRS
scrutinizing conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status and the
Benghazi attacks, there has been a flurry of letters from conservative
correspondents breathlessly accusing President Obama of corruption and
claiming that he is the second coming of Richard Nixon
As more facts have been released to the general
public, however, Benghazi and the IRS controversy have begun to look
less like scandals and more like molehills.
Take Benghazi. Emails released from the White
House reveal that it was the intelligence community – not the White
House – that was responsible for the infamous talking points from which
Susan Rice read on Meet the Press. Besides Rice, Obama is also absolved
from guilt, as military analysts have gone on record to say that even if
military planes had been sent to Benghazi during the attacks, they
would not have arrived in time to render aid. So much for Benghazi being
used to derail Obama’s presidency.
Attempts to turn the IRS controversy have met
with similar difficulties. Despite claims to the contrary, liberal
groups received the same scrutiny as conservative groups, suggesting
that the IRS was not targeting political opponents to the president but
simply doing what it thought was its job. A conservative-leaning manager
of the IRS recently told The Washington Post that he was responsible
for the scrutiny of political groups and not the White House.
There are certainly valid reasons to be upset
with Obama. Recent leaks revealing that the government has been spying
on citizens’ phone records is appalling. If the president is to be
criticized, however, he should be criticized for what he has done, and
not imaginary scandals milked by the opposing party. What happened to
Republicans vowing to focus on jobs, jobs, jobs?
No comments:
Post a Comment